Integrated Islamic Schools as Sites of Everyday Cultural Resistance: An Ethnographic Study of Urban Muslim Education in Indonesia

Authors

  • Qonitah Basalamah Universitas Nasional, Jakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22373/jie.v9i1.32327

Keywords:

Integrated Islamic Schools, Everyday Resistance, School Ethnography, Hidden Curriculum, Habitus

Abstract

This study examines Integrated Islamic Schools (Sekolah Islam Terpadu, SIT) as sites of everyday cultural resistance in urban Indonesia. Drawing on a year-long school ethnography at SIT Nurul Fikri Depok, this research applies James C. Scott’s framework of everyday resistance to analyze how cultural boundaries and moral orders are produced through routine institutional practices. The findings show that cultural resistance is enacted not through overt confrontation but through the disciplined organization of school environments, behavioral norms, and symbolic practices. The study identifies three interconnected mechanisms through which this resistance operates: strategic parental school choice, the internalization of discipline through the moral environment and staff formation, and the cultivation of a coherent Islamic habitus through repeated practices and shared moral reasoning. These mechanisms demonstrate how schools function as arenas of cultural formation where identity, authority, and moral boundaries are negotiated in everyday life. By foregrounding micro-level practices, this research contributes to the sociology of education and Islamic studies by clarifying how cultural resistance is embedded in routine institutional life. The study highlights the significance of schooling as a site where broader ideological projects are translated into lived social realities within contemporary Muslim societies.

Abstrak

Penelitian ini mengkaji Sekolah Islam Terpadu (SIT) sebagai arena resistensi kultural sehari-hari dalam konteks masyarakat urban Indonesia. Berdasarkan etnografi sekolah yang dilakukan selama satu tahun di SIT Nurul Fikri Depok, studi ini menggunakan kerangka resistensi sehari-hari James C. Scott untuk menganalisis bagaimana batas-batas kultural dan tatanan moral diproduksi melalui praktik-praktik institusional yang rutin. Temuan penelitian menunjukkan bahwa resistensi kultural tidak diwujudkan melalui konfrontasi terbuka, melainkan melalui pengorganisasian lingkungan sekolah secara disipliner, pembentukan norma perilaku, dan praktik simbolik. Studi ini mengidentifikasi tiga mekanisme yang saling berkaitan dalam proses tersebut, yaitu pilihan sekolah strategis oleh orang tua, internalisasi disiplin melalui lingkungan moral dan pembentukan staf, serta pembudayaan habitus Islam melalui praktik yang berulang dan penalaran moral bersama. Mekanisme-mekanisme ini memperlihatkan bagaimana sekolah berfungsi sebagai arena pembentukan kultural, di mana identitas, otoritas, dan batas-batas moral dinegosiasikan dalam kehidupan sehari-hari. Dengan menyoroti praktik-praktik mikro, penelitian ini berkontribusi pada kajian sosiologi pendidikan dan studi Islam dengan menjelaskan bagaimana resistensi kultural tertanam dalam kehidupan institusional yang rutin. Studi ini menegaskan signifikansi pendidikan sebagai ruang di mana proyek-proyek ideologis yang lebih luas diterjemahkan ke dalam realitas sosial yang hidup dalam masyarakat Muslim kontemporer.

References

Apple, Michael W. Ideology and Curriculum. 4th ed. Routledge, 2018. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429400384.

Bourdieu, Pierre. Arena Produksi Kultural: Sebuah Kajian Sosiologi Budaya. Yogyakarta: Kreasi Wacana, 2016.

Bourdieu, Pierre, and Jean-Claude Passeron. Reproduction in Education, Society and Culture. Edited by Pierre Bourdieu. SAGE Publications Ltd, 1990.

Bryner, Karen. “Piety Projects: Islamic Schools for Indonesia’s Urban Middle Class.” Columbia University, 2013. https://doi.org/10.7916/D8V69RR7.

Charmaz, Kathy. Constructing Grounded Theory: Introducing Qualitative Methods Series. Thousand Oaks: Sage publications, 2014.

Eade, John. “Religion, Home-Making and Migration across a Globalising City: Responding to Mobility in London.” Culture and Religion 13, no. 4 (December 5, 2012): 469–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/14755610.2012.728142.

Flyvbjerg, Bent. “Five Misunderstandings About Case-Study Research.” Qualitative Inquiry 12, no. 2 (April 1, 2006): 219–45. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800405284363.

Foucault, Michel. “Discipline and Punish.” In Social Theory Re-Wired, 291–99. New York: Routledge, 2023. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003320609-37.

Fraser, Nancy. “Rethinking the Public Sphere: A Contribution to the Critique of Actually Existing Democracy.” In Public Space Reader, 34–41. Routledge, 2021. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351202558-6.

Giddens, Anthony. The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Polity Press, 2004.

Hall, Deborah, and William H Sewell. “Logics of History: Social Theory and Social Transformation.” The History Teacher 39, no. 4 (August 1, 2006): 555. https://doi.org/10.2307/30037093.

Hammersley, Martyn, and Paul Atkinson. Ethnography. 3rd ed. 4 Edition. | New York : Routledge, 2019. | Revised edition of the authors’ Ethnography, 2007.: Routledge, 2019. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315146027.

Hasan, Noorhaidi. “Islamizing Formal Education: Integrated Islamic School and New Trend in Formal Education Institution in Indonesia.” RSIS Working Paper, 2009. https://dr.ntu.edu.sg/entities/publication/dea21aad-0262-4983-afea-bced26fa4744.

Hefner, Robert W., ed. Making Modern Muslims. University of Hawai’i Press, 2008. https://doi.org/10.21313/hawaii/9780824832803.001.0001.

Hefner, Robert W, and Muhammad Qasim Zaman. Schooling Islam: The Culture and Politics of Modern Muslim Education. Edited by Robert W. Hefner and Muhammad Qasim Zaman. Princeton University Press, 2007. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt7rqjj.

Johansson, Anna, and Stellan Vinthagen. “Dimensions of Everyday Resistance: An Analytical Framework.” Critical Sociology 42, no. 3 (May 12, 2016): 417–35. https://doi.org/10.1177/0896920514524604.

McAlister, Melani. “American Evangelicals, the Changing Global Religious Environment, and Foreign Policy Activism.” The Review of Faith & International Affairs 17, no. 2 (April 3, 2019): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/15570274.2019.1608652.

Naeem, Ayesha Fakhar, and Esha Momena Yousaf. “Case Study: The Concept of ‘Religious Tolerance’ in the Socio-Religious Construction of Islamic Schools in India.” Idarah (Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kependidikan) 7, no. 2 (December 31, 2023): 149–64. https://doi.org/10.47766/idarah.v7i2.1773.

Parlak, Fatmanur, and Mozharul Islam. “Domination and the Arts of Resistance: Hidden Transcript.” Selçuk Üniversitesi Edebiyat Fakültesi Dergisi 47, no. 47 (June 15, 2022): 367–72. https://doi.org/10.21497/sefad.1128744.

Peña-Sandoval, César, and Tatiana López Jiménez. “Ideologias Curriculares Y Concepciones Sobre Diversidad Y Justicia Social.” Cadernos de Pesquisa 50, no. 177 (September 2020): 738–57. https://doi.org/10.1590/198053147086.

Prior, Lindsay. “Repositioning Documents in Social Research.” Sociology 42, no. 5 (October 1, 2008): 821–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038508094564.

Qiso, Ahamad Abdul, Ani Nafisah, Erik Pebrikarlepi, Muhammad Wahyudi, and Ferry Heryadi. “Reconstructing the Integrative Paradigm of Islamic Education: A Critical Analysis of Integrated Islamic Schools in Indonesia.” Al-Ishlah: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam 23, no. 1 (June 30, 2025): 49–61. https://doi.org/10.35905/alishlah.v23i1.13625.

Raihani. “Report on Multicultural Education in Pesantren.” Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education 42, no. 4 (July 30, 2012): 585–605. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057925.2012.672255.

Reay, Diane. “‘The More Things Change the More They Stay the Same’: The Continuing Relevance of Bourdieu and Passeron’s Reproduction in Education, Society and Culture.” Revista Española de Sociología 31, no. 3 (June 24, 2022): a116. https://doi.org/10.22325/fes/res.2022.116.

Rothfork, John, and Charles Taylor. “Modern Social Imaginaries.” Rocky Mountain Review of Language and Literature 60, no. 1 (2006): 157. https://doi.org/10.2307/4143907.

Saquet, Marcos Aurelio. “A Perspective of Counter-Hegemonic Analysis and Territorial Transformation.” Geographica Helvetica 73, no. 4 (November 20, 2018): 347–55. https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-73-347-2018.

Scott, J C. Weapons of the Weak: Everyday Forms of Peasant Resistance. ACLS Humanities E-Book. Yale University Press, 1985.

Scott, James C. Moral Ekonomi Petani. Jakarta: LP3ES, 1983.

Scott, James C. Domination and the Arts of Resistance: Hidden Transcripts. Yale University Press, 1990.

Spindler, George, and Louise Spindler. Fifty Years of Anthropology and Education, 1950–2000: A Spindler Anthology. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2000.

Starrett, Gregory. Putting Islam to Work: Education, Politics, and Religious Transformation in Egypt. University of California Press, 1998.

Suyatno, Suyatno. “Sekolah Islam Terpadu; Filsafat, Ideologi, Dan Tren Baru Pendidikan Islam Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Pendidikan Islam 2, no. 2 (January 1, 2013): 355. https://doi.org/10.14421/jpi.2013.22.355-377.

Witriani, Witriani, Zusiana Triantini, Muhrisun Muhrisun, and Emawati Emawati. “Negotiation Identity and Religious Expression in Early Childhood: A Case Study of SDITs in Lombok, Indonesia.” Al-Jami’ah: Journal of Islamic Studies 62, no. 2 (December 30, 2025): 277–303. https://doi.org/10.14421/ajis.2024.622.277-303.

Downloads

Published

2026-01-30